Encapsulated Pour-over Coffee Brewer Science

EPO Overview

This page gives additional information about some of the science that underpins the Encapsulated Pour-Over (EPO) coffee brewing method, used in the Simple Smart Coffee Brewer.

We have always not repeated the detailed arguments and evidence that is available in the sources we quote.

Intention

The SSC Brewer, and therefore the EPO Method, was developed to simplify the brewing process for the person using the brewer. We set out to get the process as simple as possible, while producing consistently good quality pour-over coffee. We achieved this.

An unintended consequence, and one we are still exploring, is that the EPO Method has a unique extraction process that impacts the taste of the coffee in subtle ways. We are hoping to engage the pour-over coffee community to jointly explore this.

This page provides exposition, and some explanation, of the EPO Method from the ‘User Process’ and ‘Coffee Extraction Process’ perspectives. There are also some detailed comments about several of the issues / points of interest.

Summary of EPO Method

The EPO Method is a modification to traditional pour-over (albeit a zero by-pass one).

Instead of pouring water onto a loose coffee bed, the water is poured onto a coffee bed that is encapsulated within a space bounded by the brewer body and filter plate. (Unlike a Phin filter, the filter plate fits snuggly inside the brewer body to help the coffee form a seal.) The EPO Method uses the fact that coffee grinds expand in hot water to form a perfect coffee bed that eradicates the possibility of channeling and uneven extraction. See below for more details.

User Perspective

This means that the user does not need to:

  • Do a pre-infusion (or ‘bloom’). The carbon dioxide harmlessly bubbles away, like a soda, and the column of water ensures uniform wetness through the relatively thin coffee bed.

  • Perform any specific pouring technique to get the coffee even wet, and evenly extracted without opening up channels. This typically involves a delicate circular pouring action, with a gooseneck kettle, or the use of a ‘shower’ or ‘dispersion’ screen.

  • Agitate the coffee in any way.

  • Time pours to control the flow rate.

  • Manage any issues associated with ‘fines migration’.

See User Guide Page for an illustration of the user process.

Summary Extraction Perspective

The coffee extraction process is modified by:

  • Pure Percolation – there is no coffee slurry that sits above the coffee bed acting as a partial ‘immersion brew’. The water above the coffee bed is virtually clear, meaning that it has a high extraction gradient when it passes through the coffee bed. This has impacts on the extracted coffee. See the Bitterness Paradox below.

  • Percolation Extraction Distinct from Filtration – this is not an essential feature of EPO, but it is the approach adopted in the SSC Brewer. We are a little more pedantic about our language here than is typical, so to be clear:

    • Extraction is about getting compounds out of the coffee bed that we want in the liquid coffee.

    • Filtration is about removing unwanted elements from the liquid coffee that we don’t want in our cup.

    The coffee extraction occurs in the coffee bed as the water percolates through it. Secondary paper or metal filters are used to remove particles or oils from the final brew, at the user’s discretion, but they do not influence the extraction as this is already completed before the liquid reaches the filters.

  • Zero Agitation – the coffee bed sits undisturbed throughout the entire extraction process – aside from internal dynamics associated with the coffee swelling.

  • Self-governed Three Phase Flow Profile – the flow profile is very different from that associated with a V60 type brew. We do not yet definitively understand how this interacts with the Pure Percolation to impact extraction, especially later in the brewing process. (See Standard Method video on User Guide Page that shows the three phases of the flow.)

    More on Three Phase Flow.

Coffee Swelling in Hot Water

Coffee grounds swell relatively quickly when immersed in hot water. After about 30 seconds they will have reach 60%-80% of their final unrestrained size.

In a 2020 research paper it was reported that the diameter of coffee grounds increases by about 15% (see Swelling properties of roasted coffee particles - Verena Bernadette Hargarten, Michael Kuhn, Heiko Briesen). As the volume is proportional to the cube of the diameter, this means that coffee will expand to about 150% of its original volume in hot water, if not restrained.

If the coffee is encapsulated within a space that is less than 1.5 times the volume of the dry coffee (as it is in the SSC Brewer) it will expand to effectively fill the entire space available. The expanding coffee will create a uniformly dense coffee bed.

This gives the ideal uniform and flat coffee bed for the most even coffee extraction.

The encapsulation of the coffee removes the issues associated with channeling in a “loose bed of coffee” (see The Physics of Filter Coffee, p101 - referred to as ‘TPofC’ below). See Extraction and Filtration below, for more details.

Also any micro channels that may start to be opened by carbon dioxide escaping from the ground coffee are quickly closed off by the expanding coffee.

Counter Position - Coffee Does not Expand

An article was published in 2021 which, reading the abstract, appears to demonstrate that coffee grounds do not expand in water. See Critical examination of particle swelling during wetting of ground coffee - Matthew J. Maille, Kyle Sala, David M. Scott, Hannah Zukswert - 2021. This is not correct.

From a detailed reading the report states in Section 2.1 that there were 8 different samples tested. All but one, sample F, “were ground 4-6 months earlier”. We will return to sample F shortly.

Over such a long period between grinding and testing there are many factors that could impact the propensity of coffee grinds to swell in hot water. They include:

1.     Oil migration & surface oxidation / hydrophobic film
Oils move to surfaces and oxidize into more hydrophobic/viscous material that repels water and blocks entry to pores. Especially important for medium–dark roasts and coarser grinds with higher surface oil exposure.

2.     Loss of volatile hygroscopic organics (evaporation / polymerization)
Sugars, low-Mw Maillard products, and some polar volatiles that previously attracted water are lost (evaporated or polymerized), reducing the material’s affinity for moisture.

3.     Crosslinking & matrix stiffening (oxidation products reacting with proteins/carbohydrates)
Oxidation products (from sugars, phenolics, proteins) form bonds that stiffen the cell wall and reduce its ability to swell; also reduces pore connectivity.

4.     Cellulose/hemicellulose oxidation (loss of –OH / crystallinity changes)
Direct oxidation and modest increases in local crystallinity reduce the number of free hydroxyls and the swell-ability of the polymer matrix itself.

5.     CO₂ depletion (indirect effect on wetting dynamics)
With almost no trapped gas, the initial driving force that helps water enter and expand microstructure is gone; this mostly affects rate and apparent early swelling rather than equilibrium water content.

6.     Pore collapse / mechanical compaction from humidity cycles
Repeated humidity cycling or physical compaction can collapse fine porosity; important if storage environment had wide humidity swings or if grounds were tamped/compacted.

These points mean that, with the exception of Sample F, the report proves that coffee grounds tested up to half a year after grinding, do not swell (but without any details about how the samples were stored for 4 to 6 months). This has no practical relevance for us.

Returning to sample F, which was tested after grinding, this was tested in ambient temperature. From our own testing, we know the water needs to be hot to get the swelling needed in the desired time. See video below.

Over the past few years, while developing and launching the SSC Brewer, we have observed the macroscopic impacts of hot water on coffee grounds. The video above illustrates one, but the most consistent piece of evidence we have is that the coffee bed in the SSC Brewer always expands - typically by about 20% depending on coffee, grind, dose, water, etc.

The Maille et al paper does not prove that relatively fresh coffee grounds do not expand in hot water.

Self-governed Three Phase Flow Profile

The flow profile with a SSC Brewer is very different to that with other brewing methods. There are three distinct phases:

  1. Initial Flow - when the water in poured into the brewer there is an initial high flow rate as the dry coffee bed offers little resistance. This usually lasts about 15 to 30 seconds.

  2. Infusion Flow - the flow rate reduces dramatically once the coffee has expanded sufficiently to fill the encapsulation space between the brewer body and filter plate.

  3. Final Accelerating Flow - as the water extracts the soluble solids from the coffee, the bed becomes more porous, offering less hydrostatic resistance, and the flow accelerates.

This unique flow rate has an impact on extraction.

Given that the volume of flow is skewed towards the later part of the brew, and that it is generally recognized that the more bitter compounds are extracted later, we might expect to get a more bitter cup of coffee. The truth is we do not. This is because of complex interaction of the Flow Rate and the Pure Percolation aspect of the SSC brewer - the Bitterness Paradox - that we cover in detail below.

The actual flow profile for the SSC Brewer can vary significantly with the coffee dose, porosity, grind, etc. Overall it is pretty similar, but the main change is sometimes the initial flow can be much lower.

Extraction and Filtration

As Jonathan Gagne has pointed out (TPofC, p105), “for gravity-driven brews, the bed of the coffee is our best filter to retain fines and produce a clean cup.”

We think that there are three things that a filter does in most pour-over brewing methods:

  1. They remove elements that we don’t want to see in our cup of coffee. Literally, they provide filtration. (To '“produce a clean cup”.)

  2. They help control flow-rate - in conjunction with the coffee (which is generally in direct contact with the filter) and careful pouring by the user.

  3. They hold the coffee in a relatively stable coffee bed to enable water to interact with the coffee and extract the desire compounds. (To “retain fines”.)

The SSC Brewer address these three essential requirements in non-typical ways.

Filtration

A design feature of the SSC Brewer (which other EPO brewers do not need to adopt) is that the filtration is separate from extraction.

Users can insert a filter in the Adaptor downstream of the extraction, if they wish to. A fine-mesh metal filter or a paper filter is used to modify the ‘texture’ and ‘cleanliness’ of the coffee to suit user preferences. The paper filter will remove many of the coffee oils that are extracted as an emulsion rather than being dissolved by the water.

This design removes any issues associated with ‘clogging’ of the filter by fines, as if a secondary metal or paper filter is used it does not affect the flowrate (unless the wrong type of paper filter is used - see FAQs).

An additional filter can be added by stacking two of the Adaptors with paper filters in them (or metal then paper). This is useful for dealing with ‘clogging’ or ‘choking’ of the paper filter if the ground coffee contains too many fines (or if you want an exceptionally ‘clean’ brew!).

Flow Control

The flowrate in an EPO Brewer is controlled by the type of coffee, the dose and the grind size.

Any paper or metal filter used the Adaptor(s) has no impact on the flowrate. Nor does the speed that the water is poured into the brewer (unless done very slowly or pulsed - neither approach is recommended.)

Extraction - Coffee Bed Stability

In TPoC p103, Gagne highlights that the ideal coffee bed is a flat cylindrical one (as opposed to a cone shape) with no agitation and no water bypass. This is because it “produces an extraction that is more even … because the velocity of water remains constant across it”. This is exactly what the SSC Brewer delivers.

The Filter Plate and the Brewer Body - along with the expansion of the coffee in hot water - creates a stable, flat cylindrical coffee bed.

The Filter Plate performs two roles.

Firstly, it is carefully designed to fit sufficiently snuggly into the Filter Body, so that the coffee is encapsulated. The plate is made of a lighter gauge steel than the body, to provide the necessary flexibility to seal the profile and so that it expands slightly faster than the filter body - due to thermal effects - enhancing the seal.

The filter plate alone does not form the seal. It is the plate interacting with the expanding coffee - particularly in the gap between the vertical wall of the plate and the brewer body. (For the SSC Brewer, we work with a maximum open gap between the top lip of the plate and the brewer body of 0.65 mm.)

Secondly, as the water is poured onto the plate - not directly onto the coffee - it removes the risk of the water digging “a hollow at the surface of a coffee bed” which can open channels in traditional pour-over methods. This mean we can use a shallow coffee bed, not needing the “3 centimeters in depth” attributed to Scott Rao (TPofC, p102).

With its shallow coffee bed - it will have a thickness of approximately 7mm to 12mm (depending on coffee dose and type) - the SSC Brewer removes all the issues associated with unevenness of extraction through layers the coffee bed referred to in TPofC p102-3.

Given how the expanding coffee creates a uniformly dense coffee bed, that closes out and mirco-channel formation, this design results in a stable coffee bed, perfect for extraction by percolation. See ‘Coffee Swelling in Hot Water’.

Pre-infusion Processes (The ‘Bloom’)

The pre-infusion - or ‘bloom’ - phase typical of most pour-over methods has two primary objectives:

  1. To get the coffee uniformly wet before the main volume of water passes through it. This is to avoid overextraction through channels where the coffee is wetter (with lower hydrostatic resistance) as water passes more easily through this than drier areas.

  2. To prevent carbon dioxide escaping from the coffee grounds opening micro-channels in the coffee bed. This again leads to localized over-extraction.

Neither of these are an issue for the SSC Brewer.

As the coffee bed is uniformly deep (and relatively shallow) and because the water is poured onto the filter plate - not the coffee directly - water is uniformly distributed across the entire coffee bed. The coffee is always uniformly wet within the first few seconds of the pour.

As the coffee is expanding during the brew (it gets to about 70% of its total expansion within 30 seconds and is fully expanded after 4 minutes) any micro-channels opened by escaping gases are always closed off.

There is no need for a pre-infusion phase with the SSC Brewer.

Pure Percolation Extraction

Most traditional pour-over techniques, while predominately percolation brewers, have a degree of immersion brewing. Nearly all brewers have a coffee slurry sitting above the coffee bed, where immersion extraction will take place.

An EPO Brewer does not have a coffee slurry. Aside from some sugars and acids dissolving and transporting through diffusion - and some modest flow caused carbon dioxide bubbling away - the water stays pretty clean.

This gives a slightly different extraction, the experience of which is highly subjective and often undetectable. However, the fact that clean water is passing the the coffee bed does help explain the Bitterness Paradox associated with the shew volume flow rate.

Resolving the Bitterness Paradox

Given the flow profile of the SSC Brewer, where about 70% of the flow takes place in the last 1/3 of the brew time, we could expect the coffee to be more bitter than traditional brewers. This is because it’s generally understood that bitter compounds extract later in the brew. Experience has proved that this is not the case, with many people reporting a less bitter cup. Why?

Two Main Contributors to Bitterness

During roasting, chlorogenic acids – which account for up to 8% of the composition of unroasted coffee beans - degrade into chlorogenic acid lactones and then further into phenylindanes, as the roast level moves into medium and dark.

Lactones and phenylindanes are two major contributors to the bitterness in coffee.

Typically lactones give a pleasant, rounded bitterness; adding complexity.

Phenylindanes give a strong, lingering bitterness with a metallic or ashy edge. They are easily detectable, with a sensory threshold of about ~0.1 µg/mL (compared to caffeine with ~200 µg/mL). So tiny quantities can significantly affect the taste of a brew.

The concentration of phenylindanes is almost negligible in light roasts but rises sharply in the medium–dark range.

Bitterness In Light Roasts

Even though they are easily tasted, phenylindanes are at such low levels in light roasts that they are not an issue.

Any undesirable bitterness in a brew with light roasts is likely to be associated with over extraction. Light roasts retain more chlorogenic acid than dark roasts — sometimes 3–4 times as much. When these acids are over-extracted (e.g. from too fine a grind, slow drawdown, or long contact time), they degrade into quinic and caffeic acids, both of which taste bitter and sour/astringent.

This bitterness is sharper and more astringent than the deep, dry bitterness of dark roasts (which comes from phenylindanes).

Solubility in Water

After acids and salts the chlorogenic acid lactones are among the first bitter compounds to dissolve and end up in our cup. They have good solubility in water (while acids and sugars have very high solubility). Lactones contribute to the balance being sought in a well brewed coffee. We will always have them in our brews.

This means that the SSC Brewer will have as much or as little lactones as any other brewer, as the skew towards a higher volume flow rate at the end of the brew will not have an impact – lactones are not late extraction compounds. They tend to appear in the first half of a pour-over extraction (first 60–90 seconds in a 3 min brew).

Late Extraction

Phenylindanes are late extraction compounds. They are much less soluble in water than lactones.

Counter-intuitively, water that has already dissolved other compounds is actually better at extracting phenylindanes than clean water. This happens because clean hot water is highly polar and initially dissolves polar compounds first—organic acids, caffeine, and sugars extract readily in the early brewing stages. As these polar solutes accumulate in the water, they disrupt water's structured hydrogen-bonding network, fundamentally changing the solution's chemistry.

This disruption creates a more favorable environment for dissolving hydrophobic compounds like phenylindanes. Since phenylindanes are partly hydrophobic and aromatic, they resist extraction into pure water. However, once the brewing water becomes loaded with polar solutes, the altered solvent environment can more easily accommodate and stabilize these less-polar molecules. This explains why phenylindanes extract disproportionately during the late phases of traditional brewing methods—during long drawdowns, immersion methods, or over-extraction—when the water is already saturated with other coffee compounds. The solution essentially becomes a better solvent for hydrophobic molecules as it becomes "dirtier" with polar solutes.

Pure Percolation

This “dirty” water fact is a major reason that we don’t get a bitter tail end effect when brewing coffee with the SSC Brewer, despite the bias of volume flow towards the end of the brewing process. 

In the SSC Brewer, the water sits above the coffee bed without creating a coffee slurry. Aside from sugar and acid dissolving and transporting through diffusion, the water stays pretty clean – and therefore unable to easily extract phenylindanes.

Accelerating Flow Rate

It’s likely that there is a secondary factor limiting the extraction of phenylindanes – the increasing flow rate towards the end of the brew.

A longer contact time of the water molecules in the coffee bed helps with the slower extraction of the larger phenylindane molecules. With a typical SSC Brew the water dwell time in the latter part of the brew has dropped to around 15 seconds.

Conclusion

The SSC Brewer's unique design achieves what seems paradoxical: despite having about 70% of its flow occur in the final third of brew time, it can sometimes produce a less bitter cup than traditional brewers. This is made possible by two key mechanisms working in tandem.

First, the brewer maintains clean water above the coffee bed rather than creating a slurry, which means the water remains highly polar throughout the brewing process. This clean water environment is inhospitable to phenylindanes due to their hydrophobic nature, preventing their extraction even during the high-flow late stage. Second, the accelerating flow rate in the latter part of the brew reduces contact time to around 15 seconds, giving these slower-extracting molecules insufficient opportunity to dissolve.

By functioning as a pure percolation device, the SSC Brewer avoids the "dirty water effect" that features in traditional pour-over methods or immersion brewing. The result is a brew that extracts desirable compounds while leaving a lot of the harsh phenylindanes behind in the coffee bed—challenging conventional wisdom about extraction dynamics and demonstrating that water chemistry and contact time are important factors when it comes to managing bitterness with medium and dark coffees.

Temperature Issues

The use of a Lid on the SSC Brewer has two functions. Mechanically, it enables the user to lift the filter when it is still hot.

Secondly, it keeps the water at a more constant temperature while the brew is happening. Tests have shown that the water temperature is approximately 5°F higher at the end of the brew when the lid is used.

As the capillary action that extracts compounds from the ground coffee is more effective at higher temperatures, this might have a positive slight impact on the extraction, but this has not yet been thoroughly tested.

There is also no need to preheat the brewer as it is of modest mass and made from stainless steel which has a relatively low thermal capacity (which indicates how much energy is required to heat it up). Our tests have shown that if you pour water that has just boiled in a single pour (as recommended) the initial brewing temperatire will be between 195F to 205F as recommended by the Specialty Coffee Association.